Influence of intentional ankylosis of deciduous canines to reinforce the anchorage for maxillary protraction.

نویسندگان

  • Luís Fernando Castaldi Tocci
  • Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
  • Acácio Fuziy
  • José Roberto Pereira Lauris
چکیده

INTRODUCTION This retrospective cephalometric study analyzed the influence of intentional ankylosis of deciduous canines in patients with Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite, in the deciduous and early mixed dentition stages, treated by orthopedic maxillary expansion followed by maxillary protraction. METHODS Lateral cephalograms of 40 patients were used, divided in 2 groups paired for age and gender. The Ankylosis Group was composed of 20 patients (10 boys and 10 girls) treated with induced ankylosis and presenting initial and final mean ages of 7 years 4 months and 8 years 3 months, respectively, with a mean period of maxillary protraction of 11 months. The Control Group comprised 20 patients (10 boys and 10 girls) treated without induced ankylosis, with initial and final mean ages of 7 years 8 months and 8 years 7 months, respectively, with a mean period of maxillary protraction of 11 months. Two-way analysis of variance and covariance analysis were applied to compare the initial and final cephalometric variables and the treatment changes between groups. RESULTS According to the results, the variables evidencing the significant treatment changes between groups confirmed that the intentional ankylosis enhanced the sagittal response of the apical bases (Pg-NPerp) and increased the facial convexity angles (NAP and ANB). CONCLUSIONS The protocol involving intentional ankylosis of deciduous canines enhanced the sagittal response of the apical bases.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Induced ankylosis of a primary molar for skeletal anchorage in the mandible as alternative to mini-implants

BACKGROUND Mesial protraction of mandibular posterior teeth requires increased anchorage to avoid undesired tooth movements. Orthodontic mini-implants have become a popular and successful way to increase skeletal anchorage in such cases. However, mini-implants may cause injury to adjacent teeth or anatomical structures and may lead to tissue inflammation. Induced ankylosed primary teeth have be...

متن کامل

Class II malocclusion with accentuated occlusal plane inclination corrected with miniplate: a case report

INTRODUCTION A canted occlusal plane presents an unesthetic element of the smile. The correction of this asymmetry has been typically considered difficult by orthodontists, as it requires complex mechanics and may sometimes even require orthognathic surgery. OBJECTIVE This paper outlines the case of a 29-year-old woman with Class II malocclusion, pronounced midline deviation and accentuated o...

متن کامل

Dento-Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis for rapid Orthodontic Canine Retraction.

BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of canine distalization by segmental alveolar distraction method in first premolar extraction cases, to evaluate the displacement of the canine and first molar teeth, to assess the effects of the procedure on the pulpal vitality of the canines, and to determine the amount of root resorption in retracted canines. MATERIALS & MET...

متن کامل

Maxillary protraction in adult cleft lip and palate by a rigid external distraction device with dentoskeletal anchorage

OBJECTIVE The objective is to evaluate the effects of maxillary distraction osteogenesis (DO) in an adult patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) by using a rigid external distraction (RED) device with dentoskeletal anchorage. METHOD 31-year-old male patient with UCLP with severe maxillary hypoplasia, dolichofacial growth pattern, negative overjet and 1.5 mm openbite. After pre-su...

متن کامل

Orthodontic traction: possible effects on maxillary canines and adjacent teeth Part 2: External cervical resorption due to canine traction

Professionals who resist and restrict the indication of orthodontic traction, especially canine traction, often justify their stance by citing the following reasons: 1) Lateral Root Resorption in lateral incisors and premolars. 2) External Cervical Resorption of canines due to canine traction. 3) Alveolodental ankylosis of the canine(s) involved in the process. 4) Calcific metamorphosis of the ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Dental press journal of orthodontics

دوره 18 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013